Sci cli etc

I support facts and logic

Eco

I am pro environment but I am against the far left fringe of the environmental movement and minor things (non deal breakers)  within the left wing of the movement

I promote preservation of our environment and natural resources along with conservation, but not at the expense of the eco system or individual rights 

I support a “modern day Noah’s Ark’ like what Bill Bradley wanted to do here

I support environmental well being but I like the state to not get involved in the environment, as long as robust legal protections for bodies and justly acquired possessions are in place (that state action isn’t required to protect non human living beings from abuse). State action sadly often causes environmental ills , injures non human living beings and protects polluters.

I am fine with Malcolm Turnbull’s National Energy Guarantee 

Climate

On climate change I am closer to supporting Productivism than to being a Climate Change apocalype person

I am against the government and social media companies censoring and blocking people who criticize green energy transition.  Such actions by the government and social media companies is FASCIST authoritarian censorship and is against the values that our country was founded on. That is shutting down free speech  by stifling legit criticism of the government and I will not allow the government to do that. I swear to god

I believe in Climate Change but I don't believe that Colonial, racist or patriarchal systems created or fueled it. Climate Change is not a manner of human rights. I am against Greta Thunberg's radical views on Climate Change.

Climate Change will never cause temperatures to rise beyond 5.4F.  I don't believe that the Tail End risks of Climate Change will ever happen. 

We should follow the bible and be stewards for Earth ,reguardless if there is Climate Change or no Climate Change

I generally look favorably on the climate change views of the 25 to 33 percent of mainstream scientists who say man made climate change is real but downplay more elements of man made climate change/climate change than the rest of (66 to 75 percent of) mainstream scientists

"Since we only have a few months left  We Got to Start Eating Babies" /s

In some very realistic alternate realities, alternate reality mainstream scientists are divided on whether Climate Change on alternate reality Earth is real (in 2010s, 2020s etc)

I morally (as in moral victory) support the way Scott Morrison dealt with climate change as PM of Australia

China has a poor environmental record and they should be nudged to fight climate change at least as much as Michael Bennet would do if he was President

Pan

I am apolitical to mixed on pandemic politics but to on the record:

I am between pitiful and pretty sympathetic to the Mises Institute’s views on the pandemic (and some of them are LOL)

I fully support Mike Braun's amendment to the Prevent Pandemics Act. 

I am mixed to pragmatically neutral on Bill Maher's late Oct 2021 view on natural immunity

I support the Trump vaxx and I believe people should get the Trump vaxx to show their love of Donald Trump and appreciation for his work. Donald Trump saved this country by helping create the Trump vaxx

I do appreciate Ron Johnson's pandemic hearing early in the year on the pandemic to give another point of view.

I condone (but don't necessarily agree with) Gene Simmons saying that non vaxxed are the enemy

I have no issues with Adam Kinzinger’s anti China comments in 2020 (in relation to the pandemic)

What Justin Trudeau did to the truckers in Canada was fascism and crimes against humanity. Trudeau’s actions against those truckers was as bad as Democrats and liberals think that the January 6 2021 thing was

Etc

I believe in something between the Gap theory and Intelligent Design explains how we got here

I believe in Reincarnation and the afterlife

Humans are way better and superior to all AI past present and future. All AI past present and future were, are and will be property to humans. If humans punch or kill an AI robot or computer , they should get no penalty for doing so

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SupCap

 SupCap is Left Wing Capitalism SupCap is a pro Private Property economic system where everyone in a community would own property in this system.  In SupCap ownership would be based off working at a company to give everyone a fair shake so that everyone could be a Entrepreneur. SupCap is an Anti Crony Capitalism and Anti Corporatist ideology where workers would never be treated unfairly In SupCap Every workplace would have managers that compete in the market place of ideas, and see who would be a good manager of a workplace.  SupCap is similar to Market Socialism, Libertarian Marxism, and Social Democracy and it stemmed from Socialism SupCap also stems from failed Socialist states by the Marxists, and the anti-egalitarianism of Liberal Capitalism. SupCap ia Egalitarian form of Capitalism. In this system all people can be Entrepreneurs
Read more

My poltical viewpoints

I am a Social Democrat (culturally liberal),  Conservative Liberal  , Libertarian Party (especially Mises Caucus) member and aligned mostly with Republicans I support the KESK If I sound to conservative its because being conservative is counter cultural and its fun to be counter cultural (see 1960s counter cultural for an example why) Fiscal I am a Social Democrat (anti statist and Social Market variety),  Left   Lib ertarian (including  Mutualist  but especially  Mutualism lite  [ Libertarian Market   Socialism ] and  non   socialist Mutualism  i.e Market Anarchist)/Minarchist, Anarcho (‘conlib on steroids’ Anarchist) Libertarian and Peronist (Menemism) I support the Labour Party UK (New Labour/Jeremy Corbyn-Keri Starmer Labour/Third Way/Third Way Social Democracy) My combined economic views are concepts of  Economic Progressiveness  (i.e  SupCap ,  Neo Keynesianism , Libertarian Marxism,  Democra...
Read more

Reason

 From reason magazine  a June NPR interview, Rep. Joaquin Castro (D–N.Y.) said that "policing is not a marketplace. You can't choose another police force to take care of you to watch over your neighborhood." Private policing and protection is more common than most people realize and it's a proven way of making law enforcement more accountable to the communities they're paid to protect. Economist Edward Stringham, who is president of the American Institute of Economic Research and the author of Private Governance: Creating Order in Economic and Social Life, says that "in history and even in modern times, there are plenty of private examples of people working to create order and safety in society." He points to fully deputized private police departments like those of Harvard, MIT, and Massachusetts General Hospital. Stringham also cites the history of San Francisco during the gold rush, which relied heavily on private policing. The San Francisco Patrol Spe...
Read more