IP, SJW CC

IP

I am an Anarcho Libertarian and because of that , I accept humans as they are (right here right now) which is true liberty . I disavow any view that is the opposite of this view 

I support civil liberties. But I realize that the state is a predictable foe of these liberties.  I feel that the most effective way safeguard those liberties is to protect people’s control over their bodies and justly acquired possessions.

I always fight against oppression

I support equality of authority.  There is no natural right to rule and non-consensual authority is presumptively illegitimate. But I also believe that moral equality that underlies belief in equality of authority should also entail the rejection of subordination and exclusion on the basis of nationality, gender, race, sexual orientation, workplace status, or other irrelevant characteristics.

Anarcho Libertarianism is good because it (along with opAnarchism as a whole) has a unique focus on community and collaboration that goes deeper than hollow tone deaf ,inclusive Capitalism

We need to end the hate by eliminating all of our unjust hierarchies (political, economic, social etc). I want the true abolishment of all organized hierarchies. This will to a post hiearchyless world where people will be freed their hate and hostility to people who are different than they are. 

When we abolish the state, people will be freer to live off the grid, in communes fused with covenant communities since being free of the state gives people greater freedom and mobility

All of the bigoted isms (sexism, racism, heterosexism, nativism, National Chauvinism etc) are clearly repugnant as history has taught us. We have to recognize and empathize the state’s role in creating, perpetuating and exploiting these unfair mechanisms while we need to eliminate these state props for prejudice induced conduct to play a important role in countering discrimination. I am suspicious of the state and respectful of just possessory claims. I stress non aggressive solidarity  acts to deal with such discrimination so we can make society more free and less unjust toward marginalized people.  

States play a big role in the oppression of people if all identities. The birth certificate defines our gender,  age etc while legal guardianship traps us in the patriarchal family structure which includes, for better or worse,  marriage

Hierarchies are intrinsically dangerous to people who are marginalized. Anarchism spectrum ideologies (like Anarcho Libertarianism) are good because they take down hierarchies.  It is all about individual freedom and self determination

I am a Christian Nationalist

I am a Civic Nationalist

I support American Patriotism to an extent

I support Egalitarianism.  Equality is my guiding light and equality is more important than and comes before freedom

I support Banal Nationalism fused with National Centristism 

I am a Pragmatic Constitutional Conservative

I have no issues with Western culture (except when it is exported abroad then I have issues with that)

Our great culture we have today originated in Greece, Persia, Egypt and with the Cherokee peoples (to name a few). Free Democracy was born out of that and spread to almost the whole world. 

I am not against Right Wing Nationalism. I just think the concept of nations are evolving, and Right Wing Nationalism is too simplistic. If there was a way to inject Right Wing Nationalism with a shot of Transnational Historic Progressiveness , I would be open to a discussion about me begrudingly supporting it 

I reject identity politics as weaponized tribal collectivism that is antithetical to individualism

It is ok that some relationships (like close acquaintances and monogamous relationships) are exclusionary to other people. There is no bright line rule regarding permissible and impermissible exclusion. Ideally (though not a deal breaker), when particular intimate sub communities justifiably exclude someone—for the simple reason that they would cease to be the kinds of communities they are if they weren’t strictly (lime limited in size), there is clearly room for the excluded person in the broader community of which they are components. Ideally they would be welcomed/included there

When justifiable exclusion occurs, it should ideally not reflect false beliefs about or unreasonable reactions to some group of which the excluded person belongs. 

For example, perhaps A acts reasonably in deciding not to marry B because of vital differences in the ways in which B and A understand the nature of marriage, differences that might come to light from B’s membership in a certain group with a traditional view of  marital relationships in a specific way. 

But this is different from A’s deciding not to marry B either because of the fact that certain visible members of B’s group hold marital views even if (1) A does not know that B has those views or (2) B credibly denies having those views or (b) A holds to a prejudice against members of B’s group, like believing that cohabitation with a member of this group would make someone like A unclean.

From my position, I generally oppose exclusion. I make reasonable exceptions only/roughly when they don’t involve exclusion from large and relatively impersonal communities and relationships and only when they are not rooted in false beliefs or unreasonable reactions.

By saying that exclusion is morally objectionable that does not determine what counts as an appropriate solution for morally unjustifiable exclusion. It isn’t helpful or needed to justify exclusion as reasonable or morally appropriate, to be against to the use of physical force to counter exclusion. Though I believe in some rarer cases using physical force to combat exclusion is justifiable if done the right way with an eye for forcing said hierarchal systems to be destroyed quickly

I do not condemn Western Chauvinism as long as it is a friendly rivalry type Chauvinism (like sports fans being Chauvinistic about how their teams are the best or better ,in a normal, way, that type of Western Chauvinism ok). I do condemn the bigoted forms of Western Chauvinism

 I generally agree with this blog post but I am against the author of it using the term ‘blood and soil’. Using that term is wrong , ignorant and bigoted

I support the Mises Institute  even though I disagree with them on some issues

I am against White Nationalism

I strongly dislike fascism

I don’t like Ultranationalism since it is basically xenophobic. But it suits its adherents fine

PC SJW CC

My views on PC, SJW and cancel culture reflect the IDW especially Jordan Peterson and Dave Rubin

I am against Cancel culture and SJWism

I am against Censorship especially social media censorship (except when its used against the left)

Good quote "While I’m in full belief that even SJWs have the capacity for rational and critical thought, the fact that they choose not to employ it, even in the face of brutal facts, earns them the label of NPC. If your entire identity revolves around the superficial, and your entire belief system revolves around instructions from someone else, then you’re about as good as a computer program. If you won’t engage in civil debate, and instead  scream tired phrases at people when you run out of things to say, then there’s no person there, just a shell that somebody else is speaking through"

I believe that political correctness was created in good intentions (as a lot of bad things are), but is way too often overused, misused, or taken way out of context (understatement of the century and to say the very least). I use tough love with a bit of PC methods to combat PC ,and some IDW methods (but I agree a lot with the IDW on the negatives of political correctness) Free speech trumps PC. As shown below, the PC movement has now gone to the extreme and needs to be rolled back

I am against colleges (such as the ones in this linke https://www.biznews.com/undictated/2021/06/14/woke-backlash) restricting freedom of speech and being far left extremist trolls 

There is NOTHING offensive about the 1964 Rudolph Red Nosed Reindeer movie

There is nothing offensive about the movie Airplane (ie there was nothing offensive about that jive scene by Barbara Billingsley). People who are offended by the jive scene in particular are ignorant of the whole background and context of it

There is NOTHING offensive or wrong about using these phrases and I want people to use these phrases MORE than they do now just to piss off the extreme fringe left nut speech police: “Don’t cry over spilled milk”, “packed like sardines”, “on a wild goose chase”, “ants in your pants”, “walking on egg shells”, “kill two birds with one stone”, “let the cat out of the bag”, “take the bull by the horns”, “be a guinea pig”, “hold your horses”, “open a can of worms”, “bring home the bacon”, “beat a dead horse”, “put all your eggs in one basket”, “bullpen”

THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE INACCURATE WAYS THAT ANIMALS ARE PROTRAYED IN ENTERTAINMENT , ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS AN IDIOT

The song Baby It's Cold Outside is not a date rape song and it should be left alone and be as mainstream as it was in the mid 2010s and prior since it was first released.  It should not have been a victim of PC snowflakes (pun intended) who are jealous that Dean Martin . Blaming that song for date rape is like blaming video games for violence

I don't find Ari's treatment of Lloyd in Entourage offensive, it's so over the top it can't be taken seriously, and Ari loves Lloyd (not like that). 

There is nothing offensive about Notre Dame’s sports teams being called the ‘Fighting Irish’

There is NOTHING offensive about the 1960s TV series Get Smart

There is NOTHING offensive about Goonies (1985 movie)

There is NOTHING offensive about flavored ice being called Italian Ice

There is NOTHING offensive about the way people are portrayed on Disney's Jungle Cruise ride pre 2020s. They are fictional and don't apply to a real life location

There is NOTHING offensive about the puking scene in Kingpin where Woody Harrelson's character pukes after having sex with an old lady

There is nothing offensive about how Angelica showed tough love to the other babies in the 1990s Rugrats series

There is NOTHING wrong about airing Saturday morning cartoons and having commercials for sugary snacks , candies and cereals that air during commercial breaks during those cartoons 

THERE IS NOTHING offensive about the Prince kissing Sleeping Beauty while she is sleeping to wake her up. That is not date rape. It is totally inoffensive

There is NOTHING offensive about the Splash Mountain Disney ride

There is NOTHING offensive about the song 'Whistle while you work'

There is NOTHING offensive about snow being called white or the term 'white as snow' 

I don’t think the Cleveland INDIANS should have changed their name. I hope the Cleveland Guardians change their name to the Cleveland Bermuda Triangles and then bring the Indians name back as an alternative nickname but this time without Native American or India connotations (this time meaning of the Indies since the Bermuda triangle is in the Indies)

I want the Edmonton Elks to be renamed the Edmonton Teumversan Haulieramatackoos

Eskimo Pie should kept the name Eskimo Pie and NOT given in to the PC police but if they must use a new name they should be called Nanurjuk Pie

The Washington Commanders should be renamed the Washington Na’vi (after the Na’vi of Pandora in Avatar), Washington Bounty, Washington Guardians